Judge says FirstEnergy broke the law

15 September 2003


The judge ruled that FirstEnergy should have determined that the upgrades would increase pollution emissions.

The Justice Department said FirstEnergy was required to install the best available pollution control technology when work was carried out between 1984 and 1998, arguing that the additional controls were necessary because the improvements were major modifications that extended the plant's life and increased its capacity.

FirstEnergy said that the work was routine maintenance. FirstEnergy claimed that tubes were replaced in the plant's coal-burning equipment in order to minimise risks to workers. The government claimed that entire burning units were replaced.




Linkedin Linkedin   
Privacy Policy
We have updated our privacy policy. In the latest update it explains what cookies are and how we use them on our site. To learn more about cookies and their benefits, please view our privacy policy. Please be aware that parts of this site will not function correctly if you disable cookies. By continuing to use this site, you consent to our use of cookies in accordance with our privacy policy unless you have disabled them.